I first heard of “hunky turkey” about 20 years ago when
colleagues told me about the long-established Hungarian neighborhood of
Birmingham in east Toledo. Although the demographics were shifting and
individuals with Hungarian heritage were moving away, churches and some shops
remained as the cornerstone of the once thriving community that dated to the
1890s. “Hunky turkey” was a popular dish—bread topped with bacon drippings,
chopped onion, sweet peppers, and tomato—but the name was considered
derogatory, with references to poverty as well as to their outsider status as
immigrants.
In 2015, however, the name and the dish were being featured
at the Toledo Hungarian festival. Two church groups, one Lutheran and the other
Catholic, offered a slice for $3.00, and the former prepared them outside where
customers could watch as the bacon (fat back, more accurately) was deep fried
and the bread toasted. It smelled wonderful, and I succumbed. Salt, pepper, and
paprika were offered as spices, and the grease was part of the overall
aesthetic. It was tasty, and other eaters definitely seemed to enjoy it. They
also obviously enjoyed the chicken paprikash, cabbage rolls, noodles and cabbages and
pastries that were offered by the Hungarian groups. Other vendors sold standard
festival fare—fried potatoes, sausages, ice cream, even eggrolls.
The negative associations of the name no longer seem to be attached
to hunky turkey. The customers who recognized it seemed to have positive
memories, and a vendor even offered an updated version—the Hunky turkey dog!
Perhaps most of the people are far enough removed from the days of
discrimination and hardship. Or perhaps the idea that it is heritage makes the
difference. After all, heritage to most people refers to the past. Individuals
in the present can look back on that past with fondness and respect if they
want to, but it no longer controls who they are and what opportunities they
have—or what they can and cannot eat. Like other ethnicities, being Hungarian
means having certain dishes in one’s repertoire of culinary possibilities,
particularly at festive occasions. It doesn’t limit them, however, to just
those foods. The fact that the dish is now a choice means that they can
re-appropriate it, give it new meanings, and celebrate it—just as Mario Montano
described Mexican Americans in Texas doing with some of their quintessential
foods (menudo, fajitas). The idea of it being a choice, however, I think is
crucial. Otherwise, it still speaks of limitations and restraints and being
defined by one’s past. (And, given current tastes in food, it probably doesn’t
hurt that the dish features bacon!)
No comments:
Post a Comment