Local
Food and Really, Really Local Food (By
Ian Santino, Summer 2012. Environmental Sustainability Consultant to the Center for Food and Culture. MS, Landscape Architecture/Ecological Restoration, University of Wisconsin, Madison)
Local
food sure has been getting lots of attention recently, and for good
reason. Transporting food all over the
place uses barrels and barrels of oil, which releases lots of that obstreperous
little molecule we’ve heard so much about. Next these guys get into our
atmosphere and keep radiation from escaping the earth, warming us up, causing
what is inarguably the greatest current threat to human civilizations.
Additionally,
food that is grown close to where it is eaten requires less processing and
energy to ensure it will keep in shipping. Less processing means less food
wasted and more nutrients retained; less freeze drying and refrigerated food
trucking mean less energy spent and pollution released. That equals fresher,
healthier food, and a cleaner, more resourceful environment.
Still
the reasons for preferring a local food system continue. Because food is what
we spend so much of our time and resources acquiring, when you introduce a
local food economy into a community you create wealth. It’s for this reason
that producing food locally “enhance[s] social equity and democracy for all
members of the community.”[1]
When people have access to decentralized food systems, they become more
self-sustainable, taking care of themselves rather than paying another to bring
them what they need – an empowering
situation. Clearly local food is a rational response.
Eating
locally is part of a slow realization our culture is having that wealth and
sustenance aren’t just commodities that appear in the shelf of a store, but are
sinuously tied to environmental conditions. When one environment can no longer
sustain us, we import an environment from further away. This is precisely the
case in American cities – we can no longer produce our food, clothing, and
materials from where we live, so we ship them in from places where the land is
still producing. However, such centralization of functioning ecosystems poses a
dire problem. What happens when our dependency on imports leaves us without the
skills to produce for ourselves, and we can not for whatever reason?
When
I took a Permaculture Design Certification Course in 2008, I knew it was the
solution.[2]But I was a little uneasy with the over-reliance on domesticated animals and
some over-used models for food. The first criticism is beyond the scope of
today, and I will cover in later posts. The second is opposite.[3]
The apple guild and ‘chook’ (chicken) tractors were among the first designs
given for most situations. These aren’t bad designs, but they do impose
non-native species, and not a great variety of species, at the expense of the
local environment in a sort of ecological imperialism. And when they are used
extensively in each case and on a large scale, you end up replacing local,
microenvironments with one singular system. What would the world look like if
in South Carolina we had the same plant and animal communities as Maine?
So
what’s really, really local food? It is
not only eating food that was produced locally, but food that is from local,
native species. These local species evolved to the geography and chemistry of
the surrounding environment. They offer
unique, interesting local flavors, and connect people to the history of the
land they live on in a stronger way than wheat and pigs do.
And
what happens when local agriculture uses more local species? Biodiversity
increases, not only on a genetic or species level, but also on the level of
ecosystems. Biodiversity is important because it offers more options and more
back-up systems should one fail. Biodiversity is spreading your eggs out
between multiple baskets.
Now,
it’s not like we can all go out and start foraging, and the functioning
ecosystems we have left wouldn’t be able to support such a large influx of
consumers. We won’t be able to stop
using wheat, corn, oats, and soybeans either, but we can use them in
conjunction with native fruits and vegetables to create a reliable but still
locally unique agriculture, where local, edible species are planted in garden
areas. This type of food culture gives different locales – literally – unique
flavors. Visiting a new place becomes an immersive experience into the art of plant communities that nature has been painting for the past 2.5 billion years.
Culinary Tourism[4]
becomes a way of sampling different bioregions and becoming intimate with
particular ecosystems.
The
implications of eating more native species are far more complicated than most
other dieting fads. If you live in Ohio, you can’t just go to your local
supermarket and buy paw-paws, serviceberries, elderberries, American hazelnuts
and groundnuts. And it’s also a no-no to go into the wild and take all you can.
Our ecosystems unfortunately can’t handle that right now. However, you can
plant native, edible species on your property. I am currently working on a
website to help people do just that – along the lines of vegan permaculture –
which I will hopefully have up within the year. But for now? Plant a native
fruit tree. And then share the produce with your neighbors.
To
wrap up, adopting local agriculture is an important step for our cultures in
order to mitigate environmental collapse and empower communities to sustain
themselves. But rather than rely on a bland model of food production that
relies on the handful of plant species that we are currently culinarily
accustomed to, we can start eating local species. Attempting to do so will be a
learning experience, as one can’t just plant and harvest trout lilies the way
they do tomatoes, and it isn’t feasible to ship them across the country to new
markets. But the experience of working with the trout lilly is fundamentally
different than growing a tomato. You see its connections; not just
tomato-honeybee-humans-pests connections but the trout lilly-bumble bee-crested
honey creeper- orhid bee-sphecid wasp-eastern swallowtail-sphinxmoth-human
connections. The trout lilly gives a new meaning to the word ‘home.’ It
broadens the term to mean not just where we live, but where we eat and harvest,
and we are connected to the environmental history of where we live. It’s like
getting in touch with your grandfather; only it’s not your grandfather but your
ecosystem’s great-great-great grandfathers.
(Photograph of Ian Santino, Thanksgiving 2016. With a bowl of Brussel sprouts.)
[1]
Feenstra, Gail. “Local Food Systems and Sustainable Communities.” American
Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12 (1997): 28-36.
[2]
Permaculture, in a rudimentary explanation, is a design method applied to
agriculture that maximizes connections between elements and the uses of each
cog in the blueprint.
[3]
To be fair, it was and is only some permaculturists that were guilty of this
criticism. Permaculture does entirely support adapting agriculture to local
conditions.
[4]
Thanks to Lucy Long, director of the Center for Food Studies and my life 1986 –
present.